FT商学院

The assault on USAID is a wake-up call for the rest of the world

Even before the Trump administration’s slash and burn approach, international assistance was ripe for a rethink

The writer was permanent secretary of the Department for International Development from 2008-2011 and is leading a review of international development for the UK government

The wanton destruction of the US Agency for International Development by the Trump administration is misguided, shortsighted and will have devastating consequences for millions of poor people around the world. It is a more extreme version of the decision taken by Boris Johnson in 2020 to merge the UK’s Department for International Development with the Foreign and Commonwealth Office while imposing massive cuts. But it will result in even worse outcomes — reputational damage, the loss of American soft power, and the destruction of capability to address global problems that inevitably spill over on to national shores. 

Other than urging the Trump administration to rethink its approach, what should the rest of the world do in response? In the near term, the most pressing issue is to save the lives now at risk given the US represents 40 per cent of the world’s humanitarian spending. Such spending accounted for around 10 per cent of total aid in 2012. Global conflict means that by 2023 this figure had risen to 25 per cent.

您已阅读25%(1204字),剩余75%(3564字)包含更多重要信息,订阅以继续探索完整内容,并享受更多专属服务。
版权声明:本文版权归manbetx20客户端下载 所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×